![]()
|
Ignaccolo-Zenide
v.
Facts:
The applicant was divorced from her husband. A judgment declared that
the two children of the marriage were held to live with her. After the
children spent their holidays with their father in the
Complaint: The applicant complained that the
failure of the Romanian authorities to enforce the injunction issued by the
Bucharest Court of First Instance on
Holding: The Court found a violation of Article 8. Reasoning: After the assessment that the relationship between the applicant and her daughters amounted to "family life" within the sense of Article 8 ECHR, the Court repeated that there may be positive obligations inherent in the "respect for family life." It was for the national authorities to strike a fair balance between the conflicting interests of the individual and the society as a whole. In doing so, the State had a certain amount of discretion. Article 8 ECHR contains the right of a parent to obtain measures aiming at uniting parent and child and the duty of national authorities to take such measures. The Court found that the Romanian authorities had failed to take adequate and sufficient steps to comply with the applicant’s right to the return of her children and had thus infringed her right to respect for her family life, as guaranteed by Article 8. The Court therefore concluded that there had been a violation of Article 8
|
|
|
Comparative Bills of Rights ||Privacy |